‘South’, ‘mercal’ blockbuster hit films such as the following, actor, director Atlee winning coalition everyone is eagerly expecting the movie ‘Big’ in the down platform. Ejies Entertainment Pvt Ltd. The film is made by the company.
KP Influenced by the ‘Big’ in the now named “Commander 63 ‘film, her story is recorded in the writers’ association filed the case as a violation of the copyright. Also in the case, called the Big ban the film’s shooting and screening.
His lawyers on behalf of the Director Atlee PV Shraddha Balasubramaniam and Vivek, and Entertainment Pvt Ltd, on behalf of producers ejies Srinath sritevan arguing against the case, there is no reason for the case demanded that the case be dismissed. Take serious arguments in favor of Attlee was the director position, kepicelva Sensing defeat, sought permission to withdraw the case, the right to launch a new hearing of the case, the application was filed.
The same reason was given for the withdrawal of the case by the court has refused to grant the right to launch a new lawsuit. In the end, landing on the withdrawal of the case, was dismissed.
Almost all the pictures of the story charges of theft prone Nowadays, big pictures and big screen stars in the spotlight for some time to browse all the advertising lovers varattuti this judgment is a warning bell.
‘BIGIL’ – Whistles louder in the Court of law
‘BIGIL’ is the much awaited magnum opus coming from the hit Actor-Director combo of Vijay and Atlee after their successful previous block busters ‘Theri’ and ‘Mersal’. The movie is produced by AGS Entertainment Pvt Ltd. KP filed a suit claiming that Selvah One ‘Thalapathy 63’ later named ‘Bigil’ violated registered with the Copyright of his story for the Writer s Association and sought an order of injunction restraining the shoot and release of the movie ‘BIGIL’. Director Atlee through their Counsels M / s. PV Balasubramaniam and Sharada Vivek and the Producer AGS Entertainment Pvt Ltd through their Counsel M / s. HSB Partners, Srinath Sridevan suit and asked for the rejection of the Plaint itself opposed, arguing, among other things, that there was even no cause of action, for such Suit filing. After vehement arguments were advanced by Altee Director on behalf of his lawyers, sensing defeat, the Plaintiff filed an application to withdraw KP Selvah back tracked and liberty to file a fresh suit with the suit itself. The Court permitted the withdrawal of permission to institute a fresh suit suit but declined on the same cause of action. The suit has been dismissed as withdrawn now. In times, when almost all the big movies face of plagiarism issues, this verdict to bell rings out a strong warning to all who attempt such big movies and stars using hog limelight.
